who’re the three?

3 idiots is a movie that was released over christmas in an unprecedented 2126 screens across the world, multiplex screens from Cape town to Canberra carpet bombed with raj kumar hirani’s latest offering. The film has grossed over 300 crore rupees (thats about $ 70 million) in 19 days, a record in itself, and is probably on its way to settling comfortably on the summit of the largest grossers’ mountain, glitteringly studded with some other A Khan –  starrers, like “Ghajini”, or older gems like “raja hindustani”: reigning favorites till they were toppled by other, more substantial offerings like “gadar”(dir: anil sharma, whose next movie “veer” is on its way : salman leading a mercenary army in pre-handpump india- so be warned) et al.

the film was preceded by careful branding and market promotions, for this was the latest offering from a director who had provoked countrywide discussions, chatter, and more importantly, emulation from the adoring masses for his last movie, and even, to a lesser degree for his debut film: both candyfloss social commentaries with the same protagonists who stumble with brilliant comic timing through life-as-idyllic-comedy.

As I went to see it, though, my tickets placed me right next to 2 south african-indian kids, who, after watching the opening credits and Aamir’s stellar entrance, rolled to their sides, and promptly went to sleep. hmmm, not part of the adoring masses, i see.

3 idiots was also the latest movie to be graced by the great khan (henceforth known as ‘gk’), whose return to normal size after acquiring rectii, biceps and a hydra-like* deltoid in his last offering “ghajini” has been the subject of excited speculation.

so its with some degree of reserve that one approaches 3 idiots. on the one side, adulation from the masses is almost always suspicious. yet, the team making the movie seems to be adept, and the marketing seems synchronised, right down to the facetious spat over acknowledgements and titles when a legal contract was signed between all parties concerned, (whose contravention should have provoked court action, not petulant tweets and angry press conferences)

and this post is meant as a review, so I shall cut to the chase, and try to concentrate on the movie itself, and chop out the chatter.

3 idiots is a movie about 3 friends, 2 adversaries and 1 sweetheart (supported by one pregnant sister, two differently autocratic families, and a surprise jaaved jaffery appearance). The movie is set in an engineering college in Delhi, the Imperial College of Engineering, a none-too-subtle reference to the IITs in India.

Indeed, none-too-subtle is a theme that runs through the movie, as the theme of “suicide due to academic pressure” is rammed down audience throats with vigour at three separate instances in the movie. I agree that suicides are a part of professional college life in India, particularly at high pressure institutions like the IITs, and we have all lost friends or classmates to the pressures of academia: some burning out, others fading away, and a few taking the plunge towards ending it all (and successful at it).

Yet is that the dominant experience of college life? is it the dominant tragedy of our university-attending students? is the oppressive teaching system, with its over-emphasis on memorisation and academic rigour, choking creativity and innovation in our institutions?

Does 3 idiots adequately address these issues?

Does it do so without resorting to tired cliches, painful melodrama and flaccid jokes to pepper the narrative?

The answer is no. on both counts, which is sort of paradoxical, I recognise.

Right from the name of Aamir’s main adversary (Chatur Raamalingam? Why don’t you just get out the Mehmood tapes and dress up the man in a dhoti, carve out a sikha and smear him in bhasma? Why not just address him as “oye madraasi”, mister hirani?)

The geeky, no-social-skills rival does not really have to be from Madras, or Hyderabad, neither does it really behove well to pick on a person schooled in Kampala and Pondicherry (both with no hindi included in syllabus) and from a non-hindi speaking background for their poor skills in the national language. Chatur’s attempts to speak in hindi are pretty good, and he improves through the movie, achieving a passable grammar and vocabulary at the end, enough to make himself understood to movie goers without subtitles.

Yet the cliche is repeated, as always. To Hirani’s credit, at least the token muslim was not subjected to kid-gloved condescension, neither was the inventor Lobo’s dad a “God tumhe hameshaa khush rakhenge” padre in goa.

That was some relief, certainly. But the tired cliches, and the flaccid jokes, and the forced hilariousness was almost as irritating as the sight of men in their late 30’s and mid 40’s playing boys less than half that age. Admittedly, parts of the movie are funny, like the sanskrit verse at the end of Chatur’s ill-fated speech, like some of the gags with the teachers. But when this is seen in the backdrop of gk’s condescending, sanctimonious elder statesman patronage, the humour is too little compensation. 

Aamir-as-superman is a role that movie goers have come to identify since Ghulam more than 11 years ago. With the possible exception of 1947: Earth, gk has played the squeaky clean and patronising hero in all his movie: saving enslaved childhoods in “taare zameen par”, saving enslaved villages in “lagaan”, defending the nation in “sarfarosh”, defending his faith in “mangal pandey”. Its about time that the long, self obsessed biopics of himself, embellished with a million edited-to-make-aamir-look-good moments are treated with scepticism, and not unabashed admiration.

Don’t get me wrong. I would go for an gk movie far more readily than an SRK , or Salman movie, but I still think that the alaborate paeans to the man’s megalomania are getting a bit too tedious. So while gk fools around “more outside classes than inside”and “attends whichever class he wants to”, other students in the class do the boring humdrum job of sticking to the schedule. Yet gk shines in every class, does projects for other students, delivers babies using vacuum cleaners, and spends the night before the finals ferrying a friend’s invalid father to the hospital before topping the finals with the highest percentage aggregate. Any student worth his/her salt who has gone through engg / med school can tell you that at the highest level, toppers ae created by a combination of genius, obscenely long hours, application, luck and perserverance. A genius who flits airily from lecture to lecture absorbing what he can may be able to do really well in the results list, but topping? Unlikely.

But the most irritating quality of the movie is certainly its unsubtlety. And the patron saint of that is Boman Irani. If I am forced to see another of Irani’s over-the-top performances with fake lisp/beard/pagdee/wig/limp/mole, i think i shall scream. To see him as a cardboard tiger in too-high pants and tight coat, with a poisonous persona defined by peevish petulance and rather uneducated comments about “engineering”, and “machines” was tortuous, to say the least. To watch his teary-eyed capitulation to the bright side was even worse, and it is here that the movie fails to move, or even push or nudge.

All-in-all, if Hirani doesn’t change his style of aseptic cinema stories, unsubtle social messages, happily-ever-after endings, random resuscitations of paralysed patients, all embellished with dialogue that uses puerile jokes that may cause primary school teachers to blush and giggle nervously  in their classes, its going to become increasingly difficult to see his movies.

Evidently, I am in a small minority here, and along with the 2 children snoring peacefully in the seat next to me at the theatre, probably I make up the 3 eponymous heroes of this movie.

Which really answers my question, of course.

* – read: many headed.

Advertisements

4 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. anonymous
    Jan 15, 2010 @ 16:14:06

    1)Most think that movies are for entertainment…
    Disgusting cinema whores like farah khan think that movies are a scam to just make money ( using even more un-subtle cliches and almost insulting scenes- like SRK chasing terrorists in a cycle riksha)

    the arty and farty – think that movies are for SOcial change and for sending a message externally … at the same time an artist expression internally

    And while my friend your article is well worded – but is extremely lacking in comparisons. In the last One year atleast – i do not think there has been ANY movie that achieves ALL three of the aforesaid objectives- except 3Idiots

    The very fact that some director/scriptwriter actually READ a complete book … then got INspried to write an ORIGINAL script … and a star – who did not take any money upfront but placed his money where his mouth was (unlike SRK who takes 20cr for a flop like his latest one with sushmita)… plus the sheer honesty in the effort to produce a movie that is entertaining to the masses and just might have the potential to change the habits of parents who decide on the fates of their children as soon as they are born – is appreciable . ofcourse the admaker in Hirani has again given us words / brands that will outlast us ( just like “jaadu ki chhapi”, “gandhigiri” — now it is “Jahapanah Tusi Great ho ..” or the already used by insurance companies “ALL IZZ WELL”

    Over and all – IF i rake my memory — i can only remember one-or two movies that were so entertaining … and all the movies i can remember are either HIRANI ( Munna 1 and 2) or the great KHAN ( Rang de basanti – dil chahta hai – taare zameen par) … and none in the last year …

    and this movie was still far better than that atrocious ”PAA” — or the still more obnoxious ‘Whats your Raashee ‘???

    so my question is – if you didn’t like this movie — which bollywood movie did you like better than this one in the last year? it is the best movie of the year – no doubts …

    any good review is like a sandwich … with the softness of bread — enveloping the meat in the center … while your review of this movie seems like just a cold hard slice of salami – with nothing around it . You seem to have fallen in the trap of judging this movie based on your tastes and desires … and not judging a movie against its own peers

    Reply

    • nirvana demon
      Jan 15, 2010 @ 23:56:32

      well, the puerile saccharine sweetness of 3 idiots did me in. the unbelievable situations, the preachy sermonising, the tired cliches. ure ight, its a biased review. but there is so much they cud have done, break away from the karan johar style of filmmaking, dispensed with the song of soapsud covered boys exiting from spotlessly clean bathrooms in synchronisation… etc etc so on and so forth. instead, he assaults out intelligence with sad lines like “aal izz well” and sad jokes lifted from internet forwards of the 90s
      now as for good movies this year(i assume u meant 2009): Dev D, Gulaal (good in parts, but not overall), Kaminey (passable, some great timepass), firaaq (some brilliant cameos), quick gun murugan and siddharth, with other semi-interesting films like luck by chance and sankat city.

      Reply

  2. anonymous
    Jan 22, 2010 @ 12:34:44

    i concede…

    Gulaal was brilliant though in parts … and Dev-D was absolute genius … but both were not for the masses and i doubt if any of my indian friends has even heard of it. And both were excellent stories but not relevant to the common man – who has never had a line of coke – and who does not want a separate nation.

    so I completely accept that at a personal level i will keep these two movies that you mention- well above the GK/Hirani movies.
    though these movies get full marks in the last of my scoring categories ( artists expression / social commentary) … the first two categories ( Profits for the creators … and Entertainment value for the masses)- is where Hirani / Great Khan movies are so great.

    to bring about a light hearted movie with a great message – ( an original idea at that) is really appreciable.

    I just hope that having suffered on similar lines – the masses that watch this movie – will not decided on their childrens careers before their names.

    Reply

    • nirvana demon
      Jan 22, 2010 @ 15:26:08

      i agree about the overall social message that 3 idiots conveys: pre-conceived notions of what children must do, and the boxed-in perceptions that we have of success and achievement. Its seriously time we challenged the notions, and to be fair, things today are way beter than 13-15 years back, when I was forced to make these decisions.
      inasmuch, it is commendable.
      some parts were seriously funny, and that was hugely enjoyable (not to mention, oxymoronic)
      the characterisations were brilliant, and consistent all through.
      my major grouses with the movie are:
      1. aamir’s preachy, do-no-bad superhero-esque persona in the movie
      2. the casting of tamil-boy-with-bad-hindi-as-geeky-loser. Frankly, its about 20 years too late for us to bring out the same haha-madrasi! bigotry thinly disguised as comedy in hindi cinema.
      3. the vacuum cleaner
      4. the jumping out of toilets covered in foam song with the scantily-clad engineering college boys
      5. the baby coming back to life with a slogan being mouthed, the friend coming back to life with promises of his dad’s impending recovery.
      6. boman irani’s predictable persona- all beetling eyebrows and bluster.
      7. the utter un-subtlety of the messages, esp the suicide theme.

      having said all of this, don’t get me wrong. I enjoyed the movie hugely in parts, laughing uproariously, tearing at the senti-interludes. and evn at the most silly sections, i mock-moaned with a smile on my face.
      its interesting cinema, certainly. just that when i want serious grappling with social issues, i would not like it to be so aseptic and puerile.
      but that’s just hirani, i guess.
      cheers, mate, and thanks for the comments. do u air your own views in a blog anywhere?

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: